W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2005

[whatwg] [WF2] Readonly and default pseudoclass matching

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:52:06 -0500
Message-ID: <42E94576.6080002@mit.edu>
Ian Hickson wrote:
>> Further, it would make sense to me if a disabled form control matched 
>> :readonly (since it _is_ readonly; it doesn't so much matter how it got 
>> there, imo).  So for example a disabled radio button would match 
>> readonly...
> :disabled/:enabled is orthogonal to :read-only/:read-write.

I realize that, but it still seems to me that a disabled control also becomes 
read-only... is there a reason for that not to match :read-only?

Received on Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:52:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:42 UTC