- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:35:26 +0200
Quoting Matthew Raymond <mattraymond at earthlink.net>: > 6) An alternative has been proposed that has less potential for abuse, > is more powerful, and doesn't change basic browser functionality. Which alternative was proposed that did not rely on CSS and is acceptable? (Also, the alternative probably won't work in existing browers...) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2005 08:35:26 UTC