- From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:21:51 +0000
James Graham wrote: > Is there anything indicated that uses <li>? It could just use > coincidence on the same page (indeed, that seems more likely). In any > case that (in it's present form) is very much on the verge of what I > would describe as "useful". > Sorry, that was really mangled. Let's try again: Is there anything that indicates that Google Sets uses <li>? It could just use coincidence on the same page (indeed, that seems more likely). In any case that (in its present form) is very much on the verge of what I would describe as "useful".
Received on Thursday, 6 January 2005 08:21:51 UTC