- From: Greg Kilwein <gkilwein@fbsdata.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:03:40 -0600
>The problems with what I understand of your proposal are: > >[snip] > * Fallback needs author involvement > - easiest to simply not support legacy > - server typically needs to handle different names for controls, > not just different format > I'll add one more problem - the author cannot easily test the fallback content in the UA of <idate/> if the author doesn't have a legacy UA available. If the author can't easily test it, the odds of the fallback content being missing or broken are higher. Greg
Received on Monday, 7 February 2005 15:03:40 UTC