- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:36:54 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Daniel Brooks wrote: > > Ah, that makes sense. Perhaps a single sentance that states that they > are counted as two form controls just like is described elsewhere (with > a reference), but that they are otherwise skipped. The spec says: | For image controls, instead of using the name given by the name | attribute, the field's name is checked against two names, the first | being the value of the name attribute with the string .x appended to it, | and the second being the same but with .y appended instead. Thus image | controls are handled as if they were two controls. | | If the identified form control is a file upload control, a push button | control, or an image control, then the field element is now skipped. > Ah, it's in the third paragraph, but now that I read it again I see that > it says 'from script', not 'form script', so I guess it's ok, but 'for a > script' or 'for scripts' would be easier to read. The whole sentance is > "There is no way from script to detect this situation because that would > open the way for some privacy or security leaks." Done. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2005 05:36:54 UTC