- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:42:38 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen wrote: > > I think it's a good decision if you really definitely don't want to > add new attributes at this point in the WF2 process. I indeed would rather not. Feature-freeze means, well, feature-freeze. > If it not too late I'd still prefer just renaming it to "filesize" but > it can probably wait for WF3. If it was just a matter of renaming the attribute, I would agree, but maxlength="" would have to remain, so it wouldn't be just a matter of renaming the attribute. (e.g. it would imply a new DOM attribute, new prose to cover the behaviour of the attribute for other input types, a new row in the table in the appendix, etc.) > Thank you for paying such close attention to UA implementation problems > :-) Hey, without the implementations, the specs are useless. I'm not writing these specs just for the fun of it. :-) Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 27 December 2005 12:42:38 UTC