- From: Alexey Feldgendler <alexey@feldgendler.ru>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:12:24 +0600
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:03:09 +0600, Aankhen <aankhen at gmail.com> wrote: >> Thus again it is an issue of Microsoft's relative monopoly in the >> browser world. But I don't see many people arguing to declare CSS >> dead just because IE's CSS support sucks. So why should we look that >> way at LINK? > It may just be me, but I perceive a great deal of difference between > "IE supports CSS poorly" and "IE doesn't support CSS at all", only the > latter of which seems relevant in the context of the `link` element. Here is a practical question: does IE show <link>ed URIs in its Links panel? (And does IE have a Llinks panel which shows all hyperlinks found on the page?) As I'm under Linux, I can't easily check. If IE shows <link>ed URIs in the Linux panel, it means that IE supports <link> is some way. -- Opera M2 9.0 TP1 on Debian Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 * Origin: X-Man's Station at SW-Soft, Inc. [ICQ: 115226275] <alexey at feldgendler.ru>
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2005 21:12:24 UTC