- From: liorean <liorean@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 20:41:22 +0100
On 20/12/05, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au> wrote: > I suspect that it would be based on IE5/Mac, just like MSN for Windows > is based on IE6/Win. It's simply a different UI with features designed > for MSN subscribers. Yeah, it's based on Tasman. It's more improved over ie5m than ie6w was over ie5.0w though. Also it identifies itself as ie6... > > has no XML support (and thus no xml-stylesheet) but has XHTML > > support when sent as application/xhtml+xml support. > It's impossible for any browser to support XHTML if it doesn't support > XML, since XHTML is an application of XML. Therefore, your statement > doesn't make sense. I would argue that an XHTML engine may support just the XHTML DTDs with XML equivalent treatment without having a full XML engine. Though please don't ask me for a reason for going that way instead of having a full XML engine... My guess would be that the MSN/OSX browser just has an XHTML mode for the tag soup parser and throws the application/xhtml+xml content type to that. On 20/12/05, Anne van Kesteren <fora at annevankesteren.nl> wrote: > Or the implementation does not make sense ;-) True... -- David "liorean" Andersson <uri:http://liorean.web-graphics.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:41:22 UTC