W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2005

[whatwg] Menus, fallback, and backwards compatibility: ideas wanted

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 01:14:19 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0512200113270.17886@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Nate H. wrote:
> >
> > > Many people have tried this kind of thing in the past, with little 
> > > success. As far as I can tell, there is little interest from Web 
> > > authors in describing their site map (which is more a graph than a 
> > > tree, and which is getting all the more dynamic with things like 
> > > wikis).
> >
> > Well, it's not necessary to describe the complete graph. Not many 
> > authors would want it.
> 
> Any chance adopting google's sitemap format would be enough? If so then 
> authors might be compelled to create the sitemap for google's benefit 
> and then repeat the benefits of the what spec's usage as well.

I'm not sure Google's sitemaps are really what Alexey was intending here. 
(Google's sitemaps are more a list of URIs than a map.)

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 19 December 2005 17:14:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:44 UTC