- From: Gorm Haug Eriksen <gormer@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:16:08 +0100
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:32:41 +0100, dolphinling <dolphinling at myrealbox.com> wrote: > Because they're form attributes, they have no relation to anything > except forms. Semantically, there's no reason they *should* apply to any > non-form elements. The title in the specification is a bit strange. Perhaps form should be removed from the chapter title ("3. The repetition model for repeating form controls")? You can make any template you like and repeat using: document.getElementById(<repeat-template-id>).addRepetitionBlock(null); The feature is very useful without forms and not only form attributes (check 3.6 in the wf2 specification). -- Cheers, - Gorm Eriksen
Received on Monday, 12 December 2005 09:16:08 UTC