W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2005

Are the semantic inline elements really useful? (Re: [whatwg] What exactly is contentEditable for?)

From: Jasper Bryant-Greene <jasper@bryant-greene.name>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:44:52 +1200
Message-ID: <43155FF4.3090309@bryant-greene.name>


Aankhen wrote:
> On 8/31/05, Jasper Bryant-Greene <jasper at bryant-greene.name> wrote:
> 
>>>Aside: Now that I looked at the source of the literature list, I noticed
>>>that some titles of works were marked up as <em>. my hypothesis is that
>>>after an upgrade Dreamweaver has started using <em> when pressing
>>>command-i. Sigh. See http://mpt.net.nz/archive/2004/05/02/b-and-i
>>
>>http://jasper.bryant-greene.name/2005/08/31/b-and-i-are-bad-mkay/
> 
> 
> ...which says: "Of course, using <em> indiscriminately wherever you
> would have used <i> is not semantic at all".

Did you actually read the mpt.net.nz article that my article refers to?

-- 
Jasper Bryant-Greene
Freelance web developer
http://jasper.bryant-greene.name/

If you find my advice useful, please consider donating to a poor
student! You can choose whatever amount you think my advice was
worth to you. http://tinyurl.com/7oa5s
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2005 00:44:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:42 UTC