- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:38:01 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > On 8/23/05, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > > Yes, but note that the UA is not required to perform any validating or > > anything. In practice I doubt we'll ever see useful implementations > > (whereas we already have useful, and used, implementations of the > > contentEditable feature). > > Ian, I think the opposite is true, actually. Most of the browser-based > HTML editors that I saw operate by augmenting functionality of a > textarea element, and the accept attribute would work make them fit > perfectly into the WF2 world. Examples: > > http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/ > http://www.fckeditor.net/ > http://www.freetextbox.com/ > > Of course, they do use contentEditable behind the scenes. I meant implementations in end-user UAs, like Opera, Safari, or Firefox. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2005 05:38:01 UTC