- From: Dimitri Glazkov <dimitri.glazkov@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:03:53 -0500
I've been following this thread for a little while. I too think that the contentEditable is not done quite right. My biggest problem with it (and this was pointed out before) is that it is a half-way effort: there is markup that enables the editing, but there is no markup that provides any information about submission for the edits. IMHO, this is incomplete. If you provide means for entry, it shall be your responsibility to provide means for exit. I was surprised to learn that WF2 spec does not support rich textarea. I still can't figure out why. Again, IMHO, the contentEditable attribute represents a shift of paradigm in Web markup: it suggests that the actual markup of the page could be the target of user manipulation. Prior to it, users were confined to forms elements. It's not that I mind the shift. But this shift is kind of huge, and I don't think it's wise to shift just bits and pieces. :DG<
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2005 06:03:53 UTC