- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:08:57 +0100
Olav Junker Kj?r wrote: > Lachlan Hunt wrote: > >> I'm not disputing the fact that there is an unfortunate demand for >> embedded WYSIWYG editing in web based CMSs, it is the conceputally >> broken implementation I'm against. > > > I don't consider this demand "unfortunate". I consider it an essential > part of the vision for the web. The "writable web" or "universal canvas" > or whatever its called, has been a part of the vision from the beginning > (rumor has it that TBL's very first browser was read/write). Yup, see screenshots etc c/o http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/WorldWideWeb.html [[[ The broken X in the "Tim's home page" window means that the document has been edited and not yet saved. (A "dirty" flag). As a convenience, pressing Command/Shift/S would save back all modified web pages. ]]] Dan
Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2005 03:08:57 UTC