W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2005

[whatwg] Canvas element

From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:40:46 +0100
Message-ID: <4266941E.9040301@cam.ac.uk>
Dean Jackson wrote:

> I've seen the Dashboard widgets that use canvas (there isn't many of
> them). In every case it would be just as easy to use SVG, and much
> more suitable (and probably with better performance). My feeling is
> that canvas provides a worse alternative to a problem that is already
> solved by SVG (and implemented in Opera and Firefox). Or even Flash....
> and believe me it hurts to say that.

If <canvas> is so terrible, it presumably won't gain much traction. 
However it still makes sense to have a specification for it since:
a) It is relatively widely implemented (2/4 of the well known UAs) and 
specifications help ensure that the implementations don't diverge too far
b) Through specification, certain incremental improvements to concerns 
such as accessibility can be made (e.g. <canvas> as specified by the 
WHATWG allows for fallback content, which the apple implementation does not)

"But if science you say still sounds too deep,
Just do what Beaker does, just shrug and 'Meep!'"

-- Dr. Bunsen Honeydew & Beaker of Muppet Labs
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2005 10:40:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:40 UTC