- From: Olav Junker Kjær <olav@olav.dk>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:20:28 +0200
I don't completely understand the rationale for the canvas-element in WA1. It seems to overlap a lot with the use case for SVG. Of course WF2 competes directly with XForms also, but WF2 has the critical advantage that it is backwards compatible, implementable in script (which allows an IE implementation), and leverages existing knowledge. Canvas does none of this, its completely new and has to be implemented by the browser vendors. This rules out that it will ever be supported by IE, which in turn means that it will not be used on the world wide web in the foreseeable future (and most likely never). I understand that it was invented by Apple for use in platform specific applications. This makes sense, and it also makes sense that other vendors might want to support it in non-www contexts. Mozilla could use it in XUL, for example. However I dont think it belongs in a spec which is intended to cover *web* applications. SVG is at least usable in IE through a plug-in for IE, but realistically, anyone who needs interactive vector graphics on the web is going to use flash. regards Olav Junker Kj?r
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2005 08:20:28 UTC