W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2005

[whatwg] XPointer

From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:17:39 +0100
Message-ID: <851c8d31050419061756266fc7@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/19/05, H?kon Wium Lie <howcome at opera.com> wrote:
> Also sprach Jim Ley:
> Personally, I'd like to keep the list of requirements to an absolute
> minimum. I do not want to include XPointer on that list, even if it
> starts with an X.

I would to, I don't think requiring XPointer is a necessarily a good
idea, but the reason given that "it's not appropriate for the spec to
require things" is simply misleading and was done from a position of
power to stop debate, rather than as a sensible argument of why it's
not appropriate.

Seen as both Opera and Mozillla already have an XPointer
implementation (or Opera will have as soon as they have a conformant
SVG viewer) I hardly think the requirement is particular onerous one,
and should certainly be discussed on its merits not on simply "it's
not appropriate".

Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2005 06:17:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:40 UTC