- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:03:53 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Rimantas Liubertas wrote: > > I cannot agree. We should not mix typographical presentation for > presentation sake and typographical presentation for semantic reason. > While it may be not a big deal in chemistry, it is not so in math. This may be a good way of putting it in the spec: "typographical conventions with specific meanings (as opposed to typographical presentation for presentation's sake)". > Or is E=mc2 same as E=mc<sup>2</sup>? > Do log4nm and log<sub>4</sub>n<sup>m</sup> differ? Good examples, I'll use this in the spec (assuming that's ok with you!). Thanks, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2005 04:03:53 UTC