- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:28:23 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > Shouldn't the XML model (and therefore the specification) allow nested > links? I don't know, what would it mean? What would the DOM events processing model be? > Also, I think this part should be removed: > > # Otherwise, it represents an anchor: a possible end-point for other > # hyperlinks. > > ... because every element represents an anchor. (Perhaps this should be > added to the description of the ID attribute. When it is set, the > element becomes an anchor or so.) Fair enough. So what does an <a> element with no href="" represent? Nothing? Or I guess we could make the href="" attribute required. > Also, you want to replace the pointer to #LinkTypes with #link-types. > (As #link-types is already used various places it would be wise to > change the pointer and more consistent as camelcase isn't really used.) Anything that cross-refs to text past the big yellow-and-black <hr> element will be reexamined at some point, don't worry about those. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2005 07:28:23 UTC