- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:38:04 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > Current WF2 defines a way to determinate the default submit button[1]. > While it is quite useful it would be even more useful if you could > decide which is the default submit button in WF2 compliant UAs: > > # woo_ who really programs like that though.. "well, the first button > # is ALWAYS going to be the button I want to have executed" > # woo_ they apparently never had "customers" > > ASP.NET2 provides quite a useful way[2] to point to the default submit button I agree, but I think we should wait for WF3 before adding more features. WF2 is a quite big enough spec as it is, we don't want to require too big a jump for implementors to go from WF1 (HTML4+DOM2 HTML) to WF2. Consider CSS2: it introduced too much compared to CSS1, and so implementors never fully implemented it. There is a real danger in overreaching here. Before we add more, we have to work out what parts of WF2 are not actually used enough to warrant their inclusion, IMHO. > Personally I think declaring them on the FORM element might make more sense. There is not always a <form> element. For example, in simple cases that are just use an input field for interaction with some scripted code. > I know this would require quite some changes to the specification but I > think it is worth it and since the specification would get another call > for comments... The idea is to have a call for comments with _no_ comments, not to keep changing the spec. :-) Every time we change the spec, people have to re-check the changes to make sure they agree with them, and if they don't, they comment. So every change increases the likelihood that someone will send a comment. And if they do, and that results in changes, we have to have another call for comments, etc. So just because we're going to have a call for comments doesn't mean it's open season for changes. :-) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 08:38:04 UTC