Lachlan Hunt wrote: > see no problem with defining error handling for broken > documents, but no need to break conformance with SGML in the process. > HTML is an application of SGML, regardless of all the broken > implementations and documents we currently have, and I don't want to see > that changed. An innocent question (no flamewar intended): What is the benefit of having HTML defined as an application of SGML ? regards Olav Junker Kj?rReceived on Wednesday, 6 April 2005 04:02:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:40 UTC