- From: Olav Junker Kjær <olav@olav.dk>
- Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:02:06 +0200
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > see no problem with defining error handling for broken > documents, but no need to break conformance with SGML in the process. > HTML is an application of SGML, regardless of all the broken > implementations and documents we currently have, and I don't want to see > that changed. An innocent question (no flamewar intended): What is the benefit of having HTML defined as an application of SGML ? regards Olav Junker Kj?r
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2005 04:02:06 UTC