- From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:25:40 -0400
Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Matthew Raymond wrote:
>
>> That said, this is how I would process the sample markup:
>>
>> <body>
>> <p>...</p> <unnamed section>
>> <h1>A</h1> 1 A (importance level 1)
>
>
> I agree with most of what you said but the problem I have with the above
> is that it means almost every document will have an anonymous section at
> the top, and I don't think that makes sense.
If "<p>...</p>" were instead a list of hyperlinks to different
sections of the document, should that list be part of the first section?
If the paragraph inside the <p> element starts with "I'd like to thank
such-and-such for sticking by me while I wrote this...", is that part of
the first section?
The way I see it, if a heading starts a section, it should always be
the start of a section. To do otherwise breaks consistency and may
introduce semantics that are not backwards compatible in some situations.
Better to use something like "[Top of the document]" that denotes
that describes the position of the content without naming it, and also
identifies that there is content before the first heading.
| <body>
| <p>...</p> | <Top> (importance level 1)
| <h1>A</h1> | 1 A (importance level 1)
> Even in the case of:
>
> <body>
> <h1>...</h1>
>
> ...there's an anonymous section, because you have a whitespace text node
> before the element. That doesn't really work for me.
Why do outline generators need to worry about text nodes at the
beginning that contain only whitespace? You're talking about content
that won't be rendered, so for all intents and purposes, the heading is
the first item in the <body>. Such whitespace can simply be ignored by
outliners. However, if you are suggesting that such unrendered
whitespace be associated with the first section, I have no problem with
that. ;)
Received on Monday, 4 April 2005 21:25:40 UTC