- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 09:57:03 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, dolphinling wrote: > > | <ol> > | <li><h3>F</h3></li> 2.2. F > | <li><h3>G</h3></li> 2.3. G > | <li><h3>H</h3></li> 2.4. H > | </ol> (part of section started by H) > | <p>...</p> (part of section started by H) > > If one were to explicitly include section tags around H here, where > would they go? It can't start before the <ol>, because then it would > include F and G, but it can't start inside the <ol> because then it > would break nesting. Oh, sure. You can't (always) use section elements to indicate the sectioning of legacy headers. Is it a requirement that you should be able to? What's the use case? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 1 April 2005 01:57:03 UTC