- From: dolphinling <dolphinling@myrealbox.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 12:06:46 -0500
Olav Junker Kj?r wrote: > dolphinling wrote: > > WRT the "ugly consequences", if this is aesthetic remember that the > > error is coming from the UA, so it's not expected to mesh well with the > > page. If it's not aesthetic I'm not sure what you mean. > > No, I was thinking about the consistency of the language in the error > description. If one field in a form uses build-in validation, and > another uses custom validation, the two error messages would be in two > different languages. > > Consider the example error message in section 2.6: > > > The expected format is: a digit followed by three uppercase letters. > > You cannot complete this form until the field is correct. > > Imagine how this would look on a danish page with an english UA: > > : Det forventede format er: et tal efterfulgt af the store bogstaver > : You cannot complete this form until the field is correct. > > Thats what I call ugly :-) > Hmm... I took "explanatory text saying why the value is currently invalid" to mean the UA would explain what the expected format was and where it differed from what was given. I realize now though that that would be nearly as hard as guessing what language the page was in. On the other hand, I do think that error message could be a _bit_ more explanatory, and something like : Det forventede format er: et tal efterfulgt af the store bogstaver : The value you gave does not match the expected pattern. ...really isn't all that bad. > > Finally, if the page never says what language it is, how is the UA > > supposed to know? That would be a large problem on the majority of > > the web. > > You have a point there. But OTOH this would introduce a practical reason > (as distinct from a "semantic" reason) to declare the language of pages, > so maybe people would start doing it :-) > It's more than just that, though. What are the chances that the UA actually has the required language installed? I know I only have English on my computer, so I wouldn't be able to recieve a Danish error message anyway.
Received on Thursday, 25 November 2004 09:06:46 UTC