- From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:40:33 -0500
Ian Hickson wrote:
> It's not just people wanting collapsible tree views; I _am_
> [hearing] demand for that too, but those requests sound very different.
> (And indeed tree views are a lot more complicated than just <select>
> with multi-level headers.)
Yeah, I'm aware of that. The idea with <select multiple> was to
allow something that could, if the UA vendor chooses, be rendered as a
simple tree view. Full-blown tree view markup would probably exceed menu
systems in complexity. (That's a thought: reuse some of the menu markup
for tree views...)
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2004 09:40:33 UTC