- From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 14:27:57 +0000
Laurens Holst wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > >> Yeah, that makes sense. So we're saying access keys should be >> completed deprecated in HTML? > > > My vote would be in favour of that. Accesskeys are never useful and only > annoying. On some sites pressing ALT+S for my RSS reader (Sage) will > focus my cursor on the search field. Yet on other sites where I would > like easy access to the search field, no access key is set. > I disagree and I doubt whether browser makers would sacrifice HTML 4 features that may be important in some applications (e.g. intranet sites) even where long-standing usability issues exist. Instead, we should merely change the text about accesskeys to note that: 1) UAs _should_ provide a mechanism for invoking document accesskeys that does not conflict with OS/application keybindings (this typically precludes alt + key or ctrl + key). 2) UAs _should_ allow accesskeys to be assigned to elements where no author-defined accesskey exists and _should_ allow author-set keybindings to be overridden 3) UAs _should_ provide a list of accesskeys defined on the current page (2 above will necessarily require this) Additionally we could standardise accesskeys for authors (all with _should_ or even _may_ ) e.g. acceskey s _should_ be used to focus a search field. Accesskey 0 _should_ return the user to the site homepage etc.
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 06:27:57 UTC