W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2004

[whatwg] Order of repeating blocks; other misc comments

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:30:12 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406302016260.27872@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
>> Just include the repetition blocks with the values prefilled. There is
>> nothing special that happens if the repetition block is different than the
>> template.
> I think that "nothing special" is still something special, in a way - to
> the point that it took me some thought to figure out what you might mean
> by "nothing special" in this context.
> Presumably you mean that the repetition block is rendered exactly as
> sent and the content of the template is completely ignored.

I mean that the repetition block is just a <div>, or <tr>, or whatever,
and for the purposes of submission the whole repetition model is largely

> I wonder if there might be value in having a way to specify that a
> repetition block should be instantiated explicitly, with particular
> field values, without having to produce the whole repetition block
> (including, potentially, a whole bunch of content that's fixed) several
> times over.

There is:


But if you want it to work in legacy UAs, you're going to have to copy the
text twice, indeed (once to fill it in, once for the template).

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2004 13:30:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:34 UTC