- From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 01:24:08 +0100
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 23:57:04 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Jim Ley wrote: > > So, what method do we use? > > If IE has JS enabled, then you can just use the IE extensions that > implement Web Forms 2 in IE, No I can't, they will not meet my QA teams requirements (HTC's are outlawed, they're SHITE!) they'd also need to be available in a suitable licence and up to sufficient code quality to satisfy me, I really can't see that happening, especially as it's likely to be a considerable bloat to the size of each page impacting on rendering time and download times. In any case if you remember, the need to identify if support is provided for the browser behaviour is if we need to include the IE extensions, since we've just shown that the proposed method doesn't work in IE, we need another method to know if we need our legacy fix up script to run. > instead of treating it like a legacy UA. So this isn't a problem. So you're saying IE is the only UA that does this, could you point me to the test cases you used and which UA's you actually tested on? Could you also list where the behaviour is outlawed, and in which specification? Jim.
Received on Friday, 25 June 2004 17:24:08 UTC