- From: Dean Edwards <dean@edwards.name>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 19:57:59 +0100
Anne van Kesteren (fora) wrote: >> (but i think the <repeat> tag should be a PI ;-) > > > Why should it be a PI? I think that will be (far) more difficult to > understand. Nobody knows about PI's in the real world, people do know > about elements. > > I'm not sure about the name <repeat> though. It doesn't really add > semantic value to the document imho, but maybe forms are just different. > > mostly because i see this being implemented by a lot by servers instead of the intended UAs. but also, other elements have names that are nouns; "paragraph", "anchor", "image" etc. "repeat" is a verb (although it can also be used a noun). "repeat" seems more like an instruction than a thing. i don't have terribly strong feelings about it though... ;-) -dean
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 11:57:59 UTC