W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2004

[whatwg] Re: repeat element/pi

From: Dean Edwards <dean@edwards.name>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 19:57:59 +0100
Message-ID: <40DB2437.5030301@edwards.name>
Anne van Kesteren (fora) wrote:

>> (but i think the <repeat> tag should be a PI ;-)
> Why should it be a PI? I think that will be (far) more difficult to 
> understand. Nobody knows about PI's in the real world, people do know 
> about elements.
> I'm not sure about the name <repeat> though. It doesn't really add 
> semantic value to the document imho, but maybe forms are just different.

mostly because i see this being implemented by a lot by servers instead 
of the intended UAs.

but also, other elements have names that are nouns; "paragraph", 
"anchor", "image" etc. "repeat" is a verb (although it can also be used 
a noun). "repeat" seems more like an instruction than a thing. i don't 
have terribly strong feelings about it though... ;-)

Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 11:57:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:34 UTC