W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2004

Transition from Legacy to Native rendering - (was Re: [whatwg] repetition model)

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:47:29 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406241242420.27151@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> Jim Ley wrote:
>>> 1) How likely is it that a UA that supports WebForms 2 but not DOM
>>> will emerge?
>> I think it's unlikely, but it's possible.
> No, it's not. WF2 incorporates by reference DOM2 HTML and DOM3 Core,
> among others. You can't implement a WF2 UA without support for them:
> "This specification includes by reference [...]"

>From the same section:

| Implementations that do not support scripting (or which have their
| scripting features disabled) are exempt from supporting the events and
| DOM interfaces mentioned in this specification. Other aspects of this
| specification that are defined in terms of an events model must still
| act as if events were supported.

That was actually added on the request of a UA implementor who, I believe,
is working on a script-less Web browser.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 05:47:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:34 UTC