W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2004

[whatwg] Re: Is this introducing incompatibilities with future W3C work

From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:43:14 +0100
Message-ID: <851c8d310406240843ccc238f@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:55:32 +0100, Malcolm Rowe
<malcolm-what at farside.org.uk> wrote:

> The roadmap is pretty clearly laid out in the group's Charter. There's only
> one bit that isn't, and that's the intention to submit to a standards
> organisation. I think I remember someone saying that we can't talk about
> specific standards organisations, 

Well Ian has said that W3 members can't say they're going to submit
something to the W3, but since everyone keeps claiming that they're
all individuals (they're not W3 members) then they would be free to
say that they would hope they could submit it to the W3 if they can
get a member to sponsor it.  Alternatively they could rule out the W3
and say which other ones.  I don't think it should be too hard to
provide a roadmap.
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 08:43:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:34 UTC