- From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-what@farside.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:44:10 +0100
Mike Shaver writes: >> I'm not actually confident it is non-conformant (ECMAScript has lots >> of get outs allowing all sorts of extensions.) but it's on the >> interpretation of \b - Mozilla is more generous than the standard on >> what concerns a character, it's better IMO, and I wouldn't bother >> filing a bug as I'm sure it'll resolve as wont fix. > I don't think the behaviour you describe is non-conformant, but I'll > review the standard to be sure. Bug 247179, now fixed. http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=247179 > If you would file a bug about this case -- > presuming none already exists -- the Mozilla JS team would appreciate > it. I contacted Jim privately to get the details and filed the bug (and patch) myself. Perhaps I should have mentioned it here, but it seemed off-topic for this list. Regards, Malcolm
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2004 11:44:10 UTC