W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2004

[whatwg] input[type="add"]?

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 09:18:17 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406160911160.4700@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Erik Arvidsson wrote:
> Would it not be better to limit the repetition buttons to <button> since
> that would be backwards compatible. In a non-conforming user agent
> inputs with unrecognized type attributes are usually treated as
> type="text" and would therefore be a lot harder to work with. For
> <button> one can easily add an onclick (DOMActivate) and do the logic
> using javascript but if <input> is allowed this will make it a lot
> harder.
> What is the main reason for supporting both input and button?

Both are allowed because there seemed to be a convention in HTML4 to
support both, and it doesn't seem harmful.

I've changed the spec to use <button> in the examples, but bear in mind
that the default action of <button> in legacy UAs is to submit.

Actually maybe that's a good thing. It would mean you could implement all
of this on the server side if the client side doesn't have JS enabled.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2004 02:18:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:34 UTC