- From: Jonny Axelsson <jax@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:36:21 +0200
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 18:35:31 +0900, Andrew Clover <and-py at doxdesk.com> wrote: > Peter-Paul Koch <gassinaumasis at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > First of all, when I read the (very interesting) position paper, it > > struck me that every described feature can be implemented in > > JavaScript > > Am inclined to agree. I would prefer not to standardise mechanisms that > could already be implemented just as well using an appropriate > client-side scripting library. I would put this the other way around. It is desirable that the functionality can be expressed in JavaScript as it makes it easy to add support for it for other user agents. Still the goal shouldn't be to use as much JS as possible, it should be to use as little of it as possible. Similarly the goal should be to use as little markup as possible, not to make JavaScript with angle brackets. -- Jonny Axelsson, Web Standards, Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2004 03:36:21 UTC