W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2004

[whatwg] about rich internat applications

From: Kai Hendry <hendry@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 12:19:13 +0300
Message-ID: <20040608091911.GA16443@cs.helsinki.fi>
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:10:33PM -0400, Didier PH Martin wrote:
> Freedom is also the choice of how you will package your code: closed or
> open. You have then the freedom to choose your business model and the
> customers have the freedom to choose their component providers. To force to
> a single model is not freedom. I understand your noble cause, but freedom is
> also the freedom to choose your business model. An intelligent architecture
> provides such freedom.

The way I understand that tricky term freedom, is that you have the
freedom to do whatever you want until you encroach on other people's
freedom.

The freedom to take someone else's freedom (property, rights or even
closing source) therefore doesn't work.
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2004 02:19:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:33 UTC