- From: Pete Harlow <peter.harlow@thales-transportservices.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:01:13 +0200
fantasai wrote: > Pete Harlow wrote: > >> >> Another for the record: >> >> I wrote www.catnip.co.uk in validated XHTML 1.0 served text/html, and >> as far as I know it renders OK in most browsers. I had more trouble >> with CSS breaking NS4. > > > Read http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml > > (You should know that "renders ok in most browsers" != "is correct markup" > already.) Oh, but only too true. I said validated XHTML, as in the w3c's validator. It was getting it to validate, and also render ok in most browsers, that was the PITA. I wouldn't post anything that didn't go through the w3c's validator - now whether *that* is sound policy... Regards, Pete. -- This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Thales, its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2004 06:01:13 UTC