- From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:27:38 +0100
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:51:36 -0400, Matthew Raymond <mattraymond at earthlink.net> wrote: > I'm not seeing your point. If a webmaster can't rely on a fully > HTML-compliant user agent to support something, why should they use it > in the place of another HTML-based solution that always works in a fully > HTML-compliant UA? Presumably for the same reason they'd use any of the WHAT-WG specifications, despite support being only available in a tiny minority of user agents (when first available of course. Jim.
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2004 09:27:38 UTC