- From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-what@farside.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:02:20 +0100
Jim Ley writes: > +//IDN whatwg.org//Web Forms2//EN > > Personally I prefer the registered through domain name method, rather > than unregistered with WHATWG in it, I think it's neater. Oh, that's much better. I didn't even realise that was possible[1]. With that in mind, I'd like to change my proposal to "+//IDN whatwg.org//DTD HTML 4.01 plus Web Forms 2.0//EN" As Hixie and Jim have both mentioned, it's likely to change when it's standardised. If we want to be able to refer to a particular version, we can provide both 'specific', dated, versions, and also a 'latest' version, like the W3C do with the following HTML DTDs: * 'Latest' HTML 4.0 DTD (currently HTML 4.01): http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd * Specific HTML 4.0 DTD (HTML 4.01): http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/strict.dtd * Specific HTML 4.0 DTD (HTML 4.0): http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-html40-19980424/strict.dtd Regards, Malcolm [1] It's defined at http://www.y12.doe.gov/sgml/wg8/document/1960.htm, section 'K.4.6 Internet domain names in public identifiers', in case anyone else is trying to find the source.
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 06:02:20 UTC