W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2004

[whatwg] some issues

From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:48:21 +0100
Message-ID: <851c8d310407110348393c39ec@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:35:24 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> So every time I correct a typo or thinko in the spec,

No, obviously not typos, but anything substantive, yes. (and it'll be
easy to know if it's substantive or not from the context you made the
decision.)

Of course, if you aren't prepared to do the work, then that's fine, I
now understand the process is not an open process, nor was it ever
supposed to be.

> There is no point me wasting everyone's time saying "oh by the way I
> noticed that this section and this section contradicted each other so I
> fixed the obviously incorrect one".

Of course not, neither have I asked for it, that's not a decision,
it's an editorial change.

> Every post raising an issue to this list gets a reply. (I've got a backlog
> of Web Apps 1.0 issues to go through, since I haven't started working on
> those yet, and I have a few days of Web Forms ones to go through still,
> which I am going through as I edit the spec.)

Could you regularly mention the date you're up to on WF2 issues
please, so we can see if issues have been missed, or if you're simply
not up to them yet?

Jim.
Received on Sunday, 11 July 2004 03:48:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:35 UTC