W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2004

[whatwg] some issues

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:55:33 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407110853160.28210@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
>
> Because the whole point of this is it's being done in the open, if it's
> not an open process, don't pretend that it is, and don't pretend that
> just keeping a latest draft available is open, it's not!

Please describe, in detail, what you think an open process would be.


> I don't particularly care if it's open or not (I'll have zero confidence
> in the result, and the uptake of this if it's closed, I believe open is
> key, just like the Mozilla Opera position paper states)

You don't care if it is open or not, but think that it being open is key?
Isn't that a contradiction?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 11 July 2004 01:55:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:35 UTC