W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2004

[whatwg] some issues

From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:41:25 +0100
Message-ID: <851c8d3104071011415c4c0a2@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:46:18 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
>>I'm not sure that's really an appropriate answer, could you actually
>>answer the point - Why if the whole basis of the work is from that
>>paper are we not following the principles laid out in it?
>Because changing fundamental conformance criteria of XML
>is not within the scope of the WHATWG.

So extending HTML, XHTML, and DOM and CSS are all within the scope,
but XML not.   What is the motivation for this - you're happy to
change the "NOT SGML" part of the WHATWG doctype, so changing the
basic conformance requirements underlying HTML isn't a problem for the
WG, could you explain why changing the basic conformance requirements
underlying XHTML are out of scope?

Received on Saturday, 10 July 2004 11:41:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:35 UTC