- From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 14:37:44 +0100
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 09:28:45 -0400, Matthew Raymond <mattraymond at earthlink.net> wrote: > Jim Ley wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:43:54 +0100, Jim Ley <jim.ley at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, that is my point, and that with WF2 you can't have formatting > > hints because it will confuse the users of WF2 clients. Hence this > > does not degrade on legacy clients. > > Let's put this thing to bed. > > === With Javascript Enabled === Oops, not possible for me I'm afraid, the no-javascript is more important than the javascript enabled, once we have javascript enabled we can do anything. > if (!(document.implementation && > document.implementation.hasFeature && > document.implementation.hasFeature('WebForms', '2.0'))) This is surely still an open issue against WF 2 - it's been said by both me and Hixie (and I think most people inbetween) that the gross hasFeature methods don't work, especially as WF2 will be implemented piecemeal - indeed is already being implemented piecemeal. > { > document.write('<br>'); > document.write('<small>(Format: MM/DD/YYYY)</small>'); > } > --></script> And this is a script error in any case, can I recommend not doing any more scripting! Javascript quality on the web is atrocious, it's not helped by this sort of example. (we'll ignore that you're using non-standard things like globablOj.document, as that's pretty well supported in legacy.) > <label>Date: <input type="date" name="date1" value="MM/DD/YYYY"></label> This does not work for me, since it prevents me having a default value. (such as happens when you return to a form after a submission failure). Jim.
Received on Friday, 9 July 2004 06:37:44 UTC