- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 15:20:04 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Will Levine wrote: > > The spec says: > "Implementations that do not support scripting (or which have their > scripting features disabled) are exempt from supporting the events and > DOM interfaces mentioned in this specification." > However, things like the list attribute and the form attribute are > defined by DOM functions like getElementById . How does this work? > Should you just add something saying that if the DOM is not supported, > the determination of the proper element is implementation-specific? Good point. It now says: # Implementations that do not support scripting (or which have their # scripting features disabled) are exempt from supporting the events and # DOM interfaces mentioned in this specification. For the parts of this # specification that are defined in terms of an events model or in terms # of the DOM, such user agents must still act as if events and the DOM # were supported. Is that better? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2004 08:20:04 UTC