- From: Ryan Johnson <ryan@kiwi3.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 14:40:54 -0700
In what context do they support this? I've not seen or heard of this... - Ryan On Jul 3, 2004, at 2:24 PM, Doron Rosenberg wrote: > Mozilla and now Safari support this already :) > > On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 08:13:13 +0300, Max Romantschuk <max at provico.fi> > wrote: >> I realize I may well be opening a can of worms here, and I don't wish >> to >> start a flame war... but I still would like to take the opportunity to >> highlight this issue: >> >> In secion 1.5. (Missing features) of the it states that (among other >> things) a rich text editing or HTML editing control was ejected for >> this >> version of the specification. >> >> I feel that a rich text editing control should be considered for >> inclusion after all. It might be that there is some serious issue I >> haven't considered, so it would be nice to hear the original grounds >> for >> rejection. >> >> The reason I think a rich text editing control is rather important is >> simple: Almost all web applications involve some level of web >> publishing, and most end users love rich text editing. >> >> We use the MSHTML editor in one of our products at work, and the >> editing >> features have been a huge selling point. It's a real shame it only >> works >> on IE. (We have a fallback based on regular forms tough.) >> >> I believe that a standardised interface for rich text editing would >> be a >> very good addition to Web Forms 2, despite the issues with creating a >> solid specification for something this complex. >> >> I won't open up discussion on actual implementation just yet, but I >> would like to hear the opinions of other list participants on this >> issue. Does anyone else think this would be a good thing? >> >> .max >> >> PS. To save you all some Googling, for comparison: >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/browser/editing/activateeditor.asp >> >> -- >> Max Romantschuk >> http://max.nma.fi/ >> >> > >
Received on Saturday, 3 July 2004 14:40:54 UTC