- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 05:31:26 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Jim Ley wrote: >> >> May I refer you to: >> >> http://whatwg.org/charter#crec >> >> ...which has an even more strictly-defined process for exiting the call >> for implementations stage than the W3C does. > > Yeah, you never finished answering my questions about that, about > exactly what a feature was etc. It is defined right there in the charter. > I figured it wasn't particularly relevant now either, as in the recent > call for comments discussion you said it was going to be the last before > taking it to a standards organisation, not the last before a call for > implementations, I figured that wasn't necessarily relevant. One does not preclude the other (especially if existing standards organisations don't want to be involved). This is all very much still up in the air, sadly. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 13 December 2004 21:31:26 UTC