W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2004

[whatwg] Syntax Highlighting [was: several messages]

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:01:32 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0412131847230.18787@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> You're misunderstanding what tested in implementations means in the 
> context I was using it, unless the feature is proven to work, by having 
> it existing and doing something in a user agent, it shouldn't be in the 
> spec, this is why W3c specs now have the 2 implementations of each 
> feature rule.  I realise the process of this group is so much more 
> ad-hoc and it's just whatever the editor wants goes in, but surely at 
> some point it's going to put on a real footing where that sort of rule 
> needs to exist.

May I refer you to:


...which has an even more strictly-defined process for exiting the call 
for implementations stage than the W3C does.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 13 December 2004 11:01:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:38 UTC