- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:01:32 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Jim Ley wrote: > > You're misunderstanding what tested in implementations means in the > context I was using it, unless the feature is proven to work, by having > it existing and doing something in a user agent, it shouldn't be in the > spec, this is why W3c specs now have the 2 implementations of each > feature rule. I realise the process of this group is so much more > ad-hoc and it's just whatever the editor wants goes in, but surely at > some point it's going to put on a real footing where that sort of rule > needs to exist. May I refer you to: http://whatwg.org/charter#crec ...which has an even more strictly-defined process for exiting the call for implementations stage than the W3C does. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 13 December 2004 11:01:32 UTC