- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:29:09 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Matthew Raymond wrote: > > Addition to Web Forms 2.0 section "2.3. Changes to existing controls": > > "The presentation of a label should match that of the operating system > unless overridden by styling. For example, if selecting a control causes > the label to be rendered with a dashed border in the operating system, > that should be the default presentation in the user agent. I added "presentation" to the paragraph that recommended the default behaviour to be platform-like. > "A <label> element should be able to associate with an immediate sibling > control element ("sibling association"), so long as no other association > exists. The <label> element should first attempt to associate with the > next sibling, then the previous sibling. If no immediate sibling control > exists, the <label> element will be unassociated. I'm reluctant to make <label> any harder to implement than it already is. Also, one problem with that definition is it starts getting quite confusing when you have cases like: ... <input type="checkbox"> <label> ... </label> <input type="checkbox"> <label> ... </label> <input type="checkbox"> <label> ... </label> <input type="checkbox"> ... Sibling association is something I'd rather avoid in general -- I'm not particularly fond of it when it comes to the Web Apps menu stuff either. (The more I think about it, the less I like the current <menubar> stuff.) > "An unassociated <label> element has no semantic meaning." It's a label. It just doesn't label anything. I don't see any reason to say that it stops being a label just because it isn't labelling anything. > It's really annoying to go to a page where they don't associate the > labels with their corresponding radio buttons in particular. Sibling > association would be a huge benefit when viewing most of those sites. Do sites really use the <label> element and not associate it, though? I mean, sure, they _omit_ the <label> element, but I can't think of any case where I've just seen an empty one. Do you have any examples? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2004 13:29:09 UTC