W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2004

[whatwg] Re: BNF documentation for validated input types

From: Olav Junker Kjr <olav@olav.dk>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:27:06 +0200
Message-ID: <41330F0A.6050906@olav.dk>
Brian Wilson wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the following are correct for the time-related types. 
> I'm  not sure what the exact regexps would be for email and uri though, 
> and the  number/range ones will require some interesting expressions too:


BTW I agree that it is a good thing with very clear specification of 
these types, since this is really a protocol issue. It seems that the 
prose description in the spec is clear and strict enough, though, and 
more readable than BNF or regex-syntax.

Perhaps regex versions could be in a non-normative appendix. Especially 
correct regexes for email and uri would be appreciated :-)

Olav Junker Kj?r
Received on Monday, 30 August 2004 04:27:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:36 UTC