- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 07:12:01 -0400
* Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> [2004-08-25 23:36+0000] > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Dan Brickley wrote: > > > > You might also note that: Mozilla's XUL Template mechanism is based > > around matching against RDF graph structures, and that work is currently > > under-way within W3C to standardize an RDF graph query language. The RDF > > Data Access Working Group (aka "DAWG" :) is the home for this work, and > > interested parties may want to follow their efforts (WG mailing list is > > publically readable) and consider reviewing their documents. In > > particular, two editions of a "Use Cases and Requirements" document have > > been published already. > > I'm not really sure how any of that is particularly relevant to the Web > Apps 1.0 draft, though. Someone previously in the thread asked that 'relationship to Mozilla XUL' be articulated. And since it just so happens that W3C has gone standards-track with a chunk of technology broadly equivalent to XUL Templates, I thought this might be considered relevant. BTW there is also work around that shows the results of DAWG RDF queries being consumed with XSLT (http://www.asemantics.com/rdflets/ and nearby) which perhaps addresses some concerns I've heard about XUL Templates duplicating XSLT functionality. So really I just popped up to mention this 'cos "relationship to Mozilla XUL" appeared to be on-topic. I'm sure you'll let me know if it isn't. Dan
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2004 04:12:01 UTC