> On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Wrigley, Ave wrote: >>3. Finally, is it necessary to have an ERROR_ for invalid regexes Ian Hickson wrote: > No, if the regexp is invalid, it is just ignored. This is both a good thing and a bad thing. Ignoring the regexp makes sense, but also makes debugging complex regexps a nightmare. Maybe WHATWG should provide a reference implementation regexp checker and/or debugger for these purposes? Thoughts? .max -- Max Romantschuk http://max.nma.fi/Received on Monday, 23 August 2004 02:47:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:36 UTC